Critique of Mandatory Age Verification and Biometric Identity Systems on the Internet

The article presents a strong critique of emerging online age verification laws and systems that require users to confirm their age through government IDs or biometric data such as facial scans. It argues that, while these measures are often justified as tools to protect children online, they effectively create universal identity checkpoints that apply to all internet users, not just minors. According to the text, this shift transforms age assurance into full identity verification, forcing people to disclose sensitive personal data simply to access digital platforms.

The author warns that such systems undermine long-standing internet norms of anonymity and privacy, replacing them with persistent identity tracking. It emphasizes that biometric identifiers, unlike passwords, cannot be changed if compromised, making them especially vulnerable in the event of data breaches. The article also highlights the risks of centralizing identity data in third-party databases, which could be exposed or repurposed for surveillance beyond their original intent.

Additionally, it argues that age verification systems are often ineffective, as determined users—particularly teenagers—can bypass restrictions through alternative accounts or technical workarounds. It further claims that these systems may inadvertently increase risks by pushing minors into less regulated online spaces. The piece also raises concerns about future misuse of identity databases by governments or other authorities, suggesting that such systems could enable broad surveillance or social control.

Ultimately, the article frames resistance as a form of digital refusal, encouraging users to reject platforms requiring biometric or identity verification. It concludes that widespread non-compliance could undermine the viability of such systems, urging individuals to prioritize privacy and refuse to surrender biometric identity data for internet access.